I recently watched Sophie Deraspe's documentary A Gay Girl in Damascus: The Amina Profile which premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in January of this year. For those of you who don't remember, the Amina Arraf hoax involved an American man* and his wife, who had been traveling in Syria when the civil unrest began to brew. The man authored a character, Amina Arraf, whose blog contained anti-regime and pro-revolutionary rhetoric, that was quite in keeping with the spirit of the early civil uprising. Thus, it became instantly believable that such a young activist, who also happens to be gay, may very well be under threat of persecution by the state. From February to June of 2011, Amina Arraf was in the eyes of the world a real person. Electronic Intifada investigators caught out the hoax when a post was made, allegedly by Amina's cousin, that Amina had been captured by the regime.
This is not an easy film to sit through if the civil war in Syria means something personal to you. Deraspe includes footage of such breath-taking violence that it is hard not to be triggered by it, time and time again. The sheer horror of the context which is exploited for the vanity of a middle aged ESL teacher, makes his grand deception all the more despicable.
The film focuses on one of two of the hoax's victims. A young French woman who has an online affair with Amina Arraf, who falls in love with her and who shares moments of tremendous intimacy and sensuousness with her. What the film does not disclose is that Amina Arraf had left in "her" wake a long string of deceived lesbians and bisexual women with whom "she" had numerous online liaisons. In 2011, I was a member of a closed Facebook group that Amina had infiltrated. Someone from the group had invited "her" and "she" was posting regularly. Needless to say, she had many an admirer, and it was not until the truth came out that people started to share their stories of their online encounters and conversations with her. After the horrible news came out the secret group was disbanded.
That Amina Arraf turned out to be a heterosexual man should not have mortified our little online community as much as it did. After all, lesbian chat rooms have more men in them than they do lesbians, and this has been the case since the dawn of lesbian chat room time. But this was a secret group, not everyone in it was out, some people were extremely worried about exposure and we were supposed to have known better. You weren't supposed to invite someone to the group if you didn't know, first hand, that she was a bonafide, certified, Arab/Middle East/North African queer woman. The numerous women who had sexual liaisons with Amina Arraf, under false pretenses, were unarguably subjected to sexual violence, of this there can be no doubt. What is more, though, I do hope that what that collective experience pointed to, besides a renewed, collective realization of our vulnerability, is the falsity of the online encounter altogether. Regardless of whether the person on the other end is intent on deceiving us or not, this medium of communication functions in such a way as to leave us to fantastically fill in the gaps (in our knowledge of someone) with our own delusory projections. This is a perfectly wonderful and healthy digression into the fantastic if we are aware of ourselves doing it, but when we are unaware, it can potentially be very destructive.
The truth of the matter is, we as a lesbian community which includes many women who have none of the privileges of social normalization or visibility, have become so reliant on online contact for developing relationships and romantic liaisons. We risk falling in love with people who are almost entirely figments of our imaginations; figments we may have constructed, or figments that may have been constructed for us. Either way, it seems as though we are in a technological adolescence and it was my hope that the Amina Arraf hoax would at least lead to an awakening out of this curious, unwitting dis-connectedness from the actuality of the person at the other end.
*I deliberately forgo the use of names.
This is not an easy film to sit through if the civil war in Syria means something personal to you. Deraspe includes footage of such breath-taking violence that it is hard not to be triggered by it, time and time again. The sheer horror of the context which is exploited for the vanity of a middle aged ESL teacher, makes his grand deception all the more despicable.
The film focuses on one of two of the hoax's victims. A young French woman who has an online affair with Amina Arraf, who falls in love with her and who shares moments of tremendous intimacy and sensuousness with her. What the film does not disclose is that Amina Arraf had left in "her" wake a long string of deceived lesbians and bisexual women with whom "she" had numerous online liaisons. In 2011, I was a member of a closed Facebook group that Amina had infiltrated. Someone from the group had invited "her" and "she" was posting regularly. Needless to say, she had many an admirer, and it was not until the truth came out that people started to share their stories of their online encounters and conversations with her. After the horrible news came out the secret group was disbanded.
That Amina Arraf turned out to be a heterosexual man should not have mortified our little online community as much as it did. After all, lesbian chat rooms have more men in them than they do lesbians, and this has been the case since the dawn of lesbian chat room time. But this was a secret group, not everyone in it was out, some people were extremely worried about exposure and we were supposed to have known better. You weren't supposed to invite someone to the group if you didn't know, first hand, that she was a bonafide, certified, Arab/Middle East/North African queer woman. The numerous women who had sexual liaisons with Amina Arraf, under false pretenses, were unarguably subjected to sexual violence, of this there can be no doubt. What is more, though, I do hope that what that collective experience pointed to, besides a renewed, collective realization of our vulnerability, is the falsity of the online encounter altogether. Regardless of whether the person on the other end is intent on deceiving us or not, this medium of communication functions in such a way as to leave us to fantastically fill in the gaps (in our knowledge of someone) with our own delusory projections. This is a perfectly wonderful and healthy digression into the fantastic if we are aware of ourselves doing it, but when we are unaware, it can potentially be very destructive.
The truth of the matter is, we as a lesbian community which includes many women who have none of the privileges of social normalization or visibility, have become so reliant on online contact for developing relationships and romantic liaisons. We risk falling in love with people who are almost entirely figments of our imaginations; figments we may have constructed, or figments that may have been constructed for us. Either way, it seems as though we are in a technological adolescence and it was my hope that the Amina Arraf hoax would at least lead to an awakening out of this curious, unwitting dis-connectedness from the actuality of the person at the other end.
*I deliberately forgo the use of names.